CIR

Circular No. 262/08/2026-GST: ITC on Demo Vehicles Allowed in Dealer-Agency Model

Circulars

CBDT CBIC MCA

Summary

CBIC Circular 262/08/2026-GST dated 26 October 2026 withdraws para 4.6 of Circular 231/25/2024-GST. ITC on demo vehicles is no longer blocked under Section 17(5)(a) for dealers working under the dealer-agency model, where the OEM sells directly to customers. Both traditional and agency dealers can now claim ITC on demo vehicles, subject to Section 16 conditions and time limits.

The CBIC has issued Circular No. 262/08/2026-GST dated 26.10.2026 under Section 168(1) of the CGST Act. It withdraws para 4.6 of Circular No. 231/25/2024-GST (10.09.2024), which had blocked input tax credit (ITC) on demo vehicles for dealers working under the dealer-agency model. ITC on demo vehicles is now not blocked under Section 17(5)(a) for such dealers either.

The Background

Section 17(5)(a) blocks ITC on motor vehicles for transporting persons with an approved seating capacity of up to 13 (including the driver). It allows ITC only where the vehicle is used for (A) further supply of such motor vehicles, (B) transportation of passengers, or (C) training on driving such vehicles.

Circular 231/25/2024-GST had allowed ITC on demo vehicles to traditional dealers. But its para 4.6 said that a dealer who only acts as an agent or service provider of the manufacturer does not sell vehicles on its own account, so ITC on its demo vehicles stayed blocked. This para has now been withdrawn.

Two Business Models
  Traditional dealership Dealer-agency model
Who sells the new vehicle Dealer, on its own account Manufacturer (OEM), directly to the customer
Demo vehicles Some vehicles from the dealer’s fleet are used for test drives Dealer buys vehicles from the OEM only for demo and test drives
ITC on demo vehicles — earlier Allowed Blocked (para 4.6 of Circular 231)
ITC on demo vehicles — now Allowed Allowed
Why the Board Changed Its View
  • Same purpose: in both models the demo vehicle lets the customer test-drive before buying, so it helps sell similar vehicles.
  • Same treatment: in both models the dealer buys the demo vehicle from the OEM against a tax invoice, shows it as a capital asset, keeps it for the required period, and then sells it at written down value, paying tax at that time. The Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 also treat them alike.
  • “Such motor vehicles”: Section 17(5)(a)(A) uses the words “further supply of such motor vehicles”, not “the said motor vehicle”. So ITC is allowed on vehicles used to further the supply of similar vehicles, not only on the exact vehicle sold.
  • No discrimination: denying ITC to one model only had a discriminatory effect.
What Dealers Should Do Now
  • Claim within time: ITC is subject to the time limit in Section 16(4): 30 November after the end of the financial year, or the date of filing the annual return, whichever is earlier. For demo vehicles bought in FY 2025-26, check whether ITC was left unclaimed and claim it before 30 November 2026, if the annual return has not been filed earlier.
  • Pending notices and appeals: where ITC on demo vehicles has been denied, or a show cause notice relies on para 4.6 of Circular 231, cite Circular 262/08/2026-GST in the reply or appeal, as that para now stands withdrawn.
  • Keep records: OEM tax invoice, entry as a capital asset, and the demo-vehicle register or OEM requirement for test drives.
  • When the demo vehicle is sold: it is a sale of capital goods on which ITC was taken. Under Section 18(6), pay the higher of (a) the ITC taken, reduced by 5% for every quarter or part of a quarter of use, and (b) tax on the transaction value.
Example (illustrative)

A dealer working under the agency model buys a demo car from the OEM for ₹10,00,000 + GST of ₹1,80,000. Earlier, the ₹1,80,000 was treated as blocked. Under Circular 262/08/2026-GST it can be claimed as ITC, subject to Section 16 conditions and time limits. After 6 quarters, the car is sold for ₹6,00,000. ITC after reduction = ₹1,80,000 − 30% (6 quarters × 5%) = ₹1,26,000. Tax on the sale at 18% = ₹1,08,000. The higher amount, ₹1,26,000, is payable.

Related

Reference: Circular No. 262/08/2026-GST dated 26.10.2026; Circular No. 231/25/2024-GST dated 10.09.2024 (para 4.6 withdrawn); Sections 16(4), 17(5)(a) and 18(6), CGST Act, 2017. The example uses an assumed 18% rate and is for illustration only. This page is for general information only.

Official CBIC circular

Circular No. 262/08/2026-GST

CBIC · Dated 26.10.2026 · 4 pages

View circular

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. Circular 262/08/2026-GST withdraws para 4.6 of Circular 231/25/2024-GST and clarifies that ITC on demo vehicles is not blocked under Section 17(5)(a) for dealers in the dealer-agency model, where the manufacturer sells directly to the customer.
It said that a dealer acting only as an agent or service provider of the vehicle manufacturer does not sell vehicles on its own account, so ITC on its demo vehicles was blocked under Section 17(5)(a). This para has now been withdrawn.
Demo vehicles serve the same purpose in both models: test drives that promote sales of similar vehicles. Section 17(5)(a)(A) refers to further supply of such motor vehicles, so ITC is allowed on vehicles used to further the supply of similar vehicles, and denying it to one model was discriminatory.
Under Section 16(4), ITC must be claimed by 30 November 2026 or the date of filing the annual return for FY 2025-26, whichever is earlier, subject to the other Section 16 conditions.
Under Section 18(6), the dealer pays the higher of the ITC taken reduced by 5% for every quarter or part of a quarter of use, and the tax on the transaction value of the sale.
Where a notice or order denies ITC on demo vehicles relying on para 4.6 of Circular 231/25/2024-GST, the dealer can cite Circular 262/08/2026-GST in the reply or appeal, as that para has been withdrawn.
Share this
Taxation360 Advisory Chat on WhatsApp
Ask a Question GST Notice Reply ₹1,999 · Drafted & filed